Saturday, December 13, 2014

Around the world, governments promote home ownership

interesting article from pewresearch.org on how the USA compares to other countries when it comes to homeownership worldwide....




High on Congress’ long to-do list is deciding what to do about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two giant government-run companies that dominate the nation’s mortgage market (together they accounted for 78% of all mortgage-backed securities issued in the first quarter of this year). Which is another way of saying, Congress has to decide how involved the federal government should be in supporting the nation’s housing industry.

Earlier this summer, Sens. Mark Warner and Bob Corker released a proposal to gradually wind down Fannie and Freddie, though their plan would retain a government mortgage guarantee. Rep. Jeb Hensarling’s plan would go further, leaving mortgage financing entirely to the private sector. President Obama, in a speech Tuesday in Phoenix, outlined his own vision for a post-Fannie and Freddie future.

The two entities — and, more specifically, their guarantees against mortgage defaults — have long been considered key to making homes widely affordable to Americans (along with other policies such as the mortgage-interest deduction). Home ownership, in turn, has for decades been perceived as a central part of the American dream — though not so much lately, as a Pew Research Center survey last year demonstrated.

Most developed countries use tax policies, interventions in the financial markets, or other methods to encourage home ownership, according to a 2011 report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. So much so, in fact, that the United States had one of the lowest home ownership rates among 42 countries we examined (all the members of the OECD and the European Union, plus Singapore).

One thing that stands out from this list is the number of countries in central and eastern Europe with extraordinarily high home ownership levels. A 2007 paper attributed this to two forces: relatively large rural populations, who typically either built their own homes or inherited them; and the rapid privatization of public rental housing in the 1990s following the collapse of state socialism. In addition, the building boom of the 2000s likely contributed to high ownership rates in countries such as Spain and Portugal.

But even the housing bubble didn’t move the needle much on U.S. home ownership. The ownership rate peaked in 2004 at 69.2%, according to the Census Bureau — not far above its long-term average of about 65%.

Trivia: What percentage of Americans Under Age 35 Own A Home?

Answer: US Census Bureau States that only 36% of American under the age of 35 own a home. This is the lowest Level since 1980.

How to Approach Homeownership Based on Age

interesting article from realtor.com

Homeownership is a crucial component of building wealth, as seen in recent research, but it means different things for different age groups.

For example, seniors who are in the best financial situation to handle expenses after retirement are homeowners who have no remaining mortgage—they have the value of their home as a cushion in their household wealth, and they spend less on housing than seniors who rent.

Although owning a home can benefit consumers of all ages, specific homeownership strategies should differ based on your stage of life.

Here’s a summary of guidelines for approaching homeownership applied to today’s biggest generations.

Millennials

Understand the advantages of owning a home. Save for your down payment. Work on your credit score. See what you can afford to buy. Seek the advice of a local REALTOR® to advise on local demand and supply to ensure you can get a home that fits your needs at an appropriate market price. Time is on your side.

Forecasts for the economy and housing are positive, but even if there are down years in the future, your investment should outpace inflation and help you build wealth—in addition to enjoying your own home while avoiding ever-escalating rents.

To benefit most from the compounding gains of homeownership, it is best to start sooner rather than later, assuming you can afford to buy today and qualify for a mortgage.

Gen X-ers

Ensure you have a game plan to pay off your mortgage by the time you intend to retire. If you refinance to lock in lower rates, make sure you get a shorter term than 30 years.

If you were a victim of the foreclosure crisis, work on your game plan for re-entering the property ladder. You also still have time to reap the longer-term benefits—plus you are approaching your peak earning years such that shorter-term mortgages like a 15-year or 20-year loan would work. Shorter-term mortgages would enable you to retire while owning your home free and clear.

Boomers

Think about your plans for retirement and if that aligns with the remaining term on any mortgages you hold. You may also be considering retirement homes and second homes. Buying sooner rather than later will help you lock in today’s lower prices and mortgage rates while enabling you to enjoy your dream home sooner.

Plus, those young millennials you raised, taught, coached and now manage may want to buy your existing home: It’s a great time to sell.

Know the Facts Before Selling Your Home to Investors

interesting article on something I'm seeing more of in the Denver area with low rental vacancy rates....

When your home goes up for sale, you likely envision a happy family or young couple putting in their offer and living happily ever after in your former house.

However, individual buyers aren’t the only ones who may make an offer on your property.

You may receive offers early on from investors: Firms and individuals often buy residential homes to use as rentals, to resell at a profit or to build up a property portfolio.

And as with most transactions, there are upsides and downsides in selling your home to investors. Make sure you know everything you can before you act.

Advantages

Selling to an investor over a traditional buyer has some key advantages:
◾A regular buyer typically needs to wait for financing. This delay can slow down closing, and you may have to wait longer to finish the deal. Investors often buy in cash and are ready to close immediately, which is a huge perk if you’re looking to sell quickly.
◾Many investors are willing to offer flexible arrangements. For example, an investor might be willing to take over your mortgage, which is great if you’re underwater and struggling to find a buyer.
◾Most investors buy a property “as is”: If you haven’t kept up with home repairs or if your kitchen needs an upgrade, this is an attractive option.

Disadvantages

Working with an investor isn’t always better than working with a traditional buyer. Consider these factors before you make a deal:
◾You won’t know who is buying your house. Investors aren’t legally required to tell you who is making the offer or why they want to buy your home. Some buyers may wonder if an investor only is interested because they know they can flip the property for more money.
◾You may not get the best deal. Most investors only buy properties that are below market value, while a buyer might pay your asking price.
◾You’ll have to do extra research to vet the investor and make sure you’re not being scammed.

Making a Deal With an Investor

Finding an investor might not be easy. Investors typically look for properties they can get cheap in great locations. For example, a home that’s under market value in an area popular for renters is a great deal for an investor.

Usually, investors identify properties through their own research. However, you can increase your chances by working with a REALTOR® who’s worked with investors in the past and can reach out to these firms to promote your property.

Once you have an offer, look over the deal carefully. If the investor put in a low offer on a home you just listed, taking the deal might not make sense. But if your home has been on the market for months with no nibbles, working with an investor may make sense.

If you’re struggling to decide, remember to work with a REALTOR®: They can point you in the right direction.

REALTORS® Expect Modest Price Growth in Next 12 Months-2015

interesting article from economist outlook blog from National Association of Realtors...

With rising inventory and modest expectations of demand growth, REALTORS® responding to the October 2014 survey expected home prices to increase modestly in the next 12 months, according to data gathered from the October 2014 REALTORS® Confidence Index Survey: http://www.realtor.org/reports/realtors-confidence-index[1]. Local conditions vary with expectations anchored on factors such as the level of inventory, the state of the local job market, and credit conditions.

The median expected price increase is about 3 percent. The map shows the median expected price change in the next 12 months based on the August – October 2014 surveys[2]. No state had a median expected price growth above 5 percent. States with the most upbeat price expectations (orange) include California, Washington, North Dakota, Texas, Florida, Georgia, the District of Columbia, and Massachusetts–states with strong housing markets, job growth, and economies.


[1] The median expected price change is the value such that 50 percent of respondents expect prices to change above this value and 50 percent of respondents expect prices to change below this value. A median expected price change is computed for each state based on the respondents for that state. The graph shows the range of these state median expected price change. To increase sample size, the data is averaged from the last three survey months.


[2] In generating the median price expectation at the state level, we use data for the last three surveys to have close to 30 observations. Small states such as AK,ND, SD, MT, VT, WY, WV, DE, and the D.C. may have less than 30 observations.

Purchasing 'Air Rights' part of Dowtown Penthouse Landscape

interesting article from aspendailynews.com

Buyer of most expensive per-square-foot condo paid more to ensure keeping view

Even Aspen’s air space is worth a hefty price in the lucrative world of real estate.

The price on the record-breaking downtown penthouse sale that occurred last month was driven partly by the buyer purchasing the “air rights” above an adjacent building to ensure views of Aspen Mountain in perpetuity.

The sale of the 5,053-square-foot condo on top of the Muse building located at 625 E. Hyman Ave. for $15.8 million was the most expensive per-square-foot downtown penthouse ever sold. It pencils out to $3,126 a square foot.

“That is a record for a downtown penthouse for sure,” said Tim Estin, a residential real estate broker at Aspen Snowmass Sotheby’s Real Estate who writes a blog called Estin Report about Aspen homes and the market.

The Muse penthouse buyers bought the property from developer Nikos Hecht, who included the air rights above the building at 602 E. Cooper Ave., which is home to the Mezzaluna restaurant and is located south of the residential property. The penthouse’s rooftop deck is taller than the Mezzaluna building and has direct views of Aspen Mountain.

The deal for the air rights means that, in effect, no vertical development can occur on the Cooper Avenue property, which according to county assessor records is called Hunter Plaza. It is owned by downtown landlords Tony Mazza and Frank Woods who reportedly sold the air rights above their building to Hecht.

Craig Morris, the Sotheby’s International Realty broker who represented the buyer in the penthouse sale, said the deal also is known as buying a “view plane easement.” The dollar value of those air rights is not disclosed but Morris said it was “a lot,” and it was part of the purchase price. He also noted that it’s the first time he has seen or heard about such a deal.

City of Aspen community development director Chris Bendon said he has heard of buying an easement to a view plane but “it’s not common.”

It’s not just the air rights that contribute to the penthouse’s high price tag in terms of square footage — it’s also the size and layout.

“It’s a unique layout,” said Brandon Blocker, a Sotheby’s International Realty agent who also represented the buyer. “It’s 5,000 square feet all on one level and a deck ... and they bought the air rights so their view can’t be blocked.”

It is a four-bedroom, four-and-a-half bathroom penthouse with a rooftop deck and pool.

Bigger is better

The Muse penthouse is one of a handful of residential units in the commercial core that is larger than what the city code allows for, which is a maximum of 2,500 square feet.

“It’s a very special and unique property; it’s almost one-of-a-kind,” Blocker said. “It’s really hard to find in the core because of the square footage.”

Also a contributing factor is the fact that penthouses are no longer permitted in the commercial core as a result of legislation passed in 2012.

Before Aspen City Council passed that ordinance, several building owners submitted land-use applications that include the development, allowed by right, of up to 2,500-square-foot penthouses. These properties include the old Aspen Athletic Club, Charles Cunniffe Architects offices, the Garfield & Hecht law office, Zocalito and the Red Onion annex.

Two penthouses are under construction — at the corner of Spring Street and Hopkins Avenue by developer Greg Hills, and the other on Hyman Avenue which also is owned by Hecht, along with his father, Andy. The Aspen Core building, at the corner of Hyman and Hunter, will house two penthouse units at 1,500 square feet and 6,000 square feet. They are not allowed to be combined, Bendon noted.

Both Hyman Avenue penthouses — at the Muse and Aspen Core buildings — were borne out of negotiations with the city of Aspen. The Muse building, located next to the Aspen Art Museum, was allowed after Nikos Hecht sued the city for denying an earlier development proposal at the council table. The settlement resulted in two top-floor residences that were allowed to be combined, Bendon said, as well as the next-door Aspen Art Museum. The Aspen Core penthouses were negotiated in exchange for the Hechts not knocking down two now historically designated properties next door — the Tom Benton building and Little Annie’s Eating House.

“Penthouses are a diminishing asset in town,” Estin said, adding that as the number of those types of properties continues to dwindle their value goes up.

Bendon agreed.

“Fundamentally, the biggest factor is there are many more people who want that product,” he said. “That is the market solution for folks.”

More competition in the marketplace

Estin said the 14 townhomes approved on South Aspen Street, which are the alternative to a failed hotel development on the same site, are in direct competition with downtown penthouses.

“The OneAspen townhomes have added a wrinkle,” he said, adding the price per square foot for them hovers between $1,700 and $2,900.

Maureen Stapleton, a broker for Sotheby’s International Realty, confirmed that eight of the 14 townhomes have been reserved with a refundable $250,000 deposit. They went on the market in July and range between $8.5 million and $16.2 million. Their sizes are between 4,067 square feet and 5,722 square feet. They are expected to begin construction in the spring and be completed by June of 2016.

She noted that the townhomes are in the last prime location — not only walking distance to the downtown core but also at the base of Aspen Mountain. The site is also located near two city parks.

“We are so limited by growth and our surroundings,” she said. “That neighborhood is going to be fantastic.”