Monday, March 30, 2015

It Looks Like A 200-Year-Old Crumbling Home, But Inside It’s A Different Story

neat featured property from archfly.com

We know not to judge a book by its cover, or in this case a home by its exterior. This 200-year-old stone house in Linescio, Switzerland certainly proves that better than most anything we’ve seen. Even as you walk around the outside and see the crumbling stone walls right in front of your face, you’d have a hard time believing it was recently renovated. That’s because it was only renovated on the inside.











Monday, March 23, 2015

Man Posts Pictures To Sell His Never-Been-Used 1956 Kitchen

from sfglobe.com

Man Posts Pictures To Sell His Never-Been-Used 1956 Kitchen

Nathan Chandler posted pictures to sell his kitchen on Flickr. This is no ordinary kitchen, though. The house itself was built in 1956, and the kitchen is equipped with vintage GE appliances. The extraordinary part? The house hasn't been occupied and the appliances have never been used!

Take a look at this delightful tour of the kitchen, a true historic walk-through!

A one-of-a-kind marvel! Check out that rounded pink counter top and the retro flooring.


Heads Up—This Might Be the ‘Last Call’ for Low Mortgage Rates

interesting article from realtor.com this past week....

Consider this a gift to home buyers: Mortgage interest rates dipped to 3.78% this week, just in time for the spring housing market.

For people who are in the process of buying a house, our best advice is to lock in your rate now. “This is the last call before the bar closes at these historically low levels,” said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at realtor.com®.

Currently, rates are low, but they are expected to rise. On Wednesday the Federal Reserve issued its first warning that rates will increase in the near term, because the economy has stabilized. The Fed has been propping up the economy by keeping rates at zero since late 2008, when the housing market collapsed. Now that employment is up, gas prices are low, and consumers are feeling more confident about the future, interest rates are sure to rise. Observers expect the Fed action to happen as early as June.

“From here, rates should go up more than down, which means affordability declines rapidly,” Smoke said. “It also means that navigating mortgage choices becomes simultaneously more important , but also more complex as higher rates would cause qualifications to be harder and some options will fall off the table.”

It goes to reason that as interest rates increase, affordability decreases. Home prices are rising and now that rates are indicated to follow suit, your buying power will not be as great as it once was. These are the waning days of remarkably low rates.

According to the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey:
◾30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 3.78%, down from last week when it averaged 3.86%. A year ago at this time, it averaged 4.32%.
◾15-year FRM this week averaged 3.06%, down from 3.1% last week and 3.32% last year at this time.
◾5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage averaged 2.97%, down from last week when it averaged 3.01%. It averaged 3.02% last year this time.
◾1-year Treasury-indexed ARM averaged 2.46%, unchanged from last week. At this time last year, it averaged 2.49%.

See Who Pays the Highest (and Lowest) Property Taxes

interesting article to know where Colorado stands from realestate.aol.com

See Who Pays the Highest (and Lowest) Property Taxes

Another year, another top billing New Jersey homeowners would love to lose. The Garden State had the country's highest median real estate tax bill in 2013 at $7,331, according to recently released Census data.

The good news for New Jersey homeowners -- if you can call it that -- is last year's median bill increased just 2 percent from 2012, when it also topped the list. The state's high real estate taxes have long been fodder for politicians and late-night talk show hosts alike.

Alabama homeowners had the lowest median property tax bill ($532) in 2013. Nationally, the median tab was just under $2,100.

All but two of the top 10 costliest states are in the Northeast:



According to the 2013 American Community Survey, here's a look at the bottom 10:



To be sure, property taxes provide an interesting but incomplete picture of a homeowner's overall tax burden. Consumers may pay little in real estate taxes but face higher sales or state income taxes. The flip side holds, too. For example, Alaska homeowners had a median $3,008 tax bill last year, but residents pay no state income taxes.

Another way to look at property taxes is to consider them in the context of a home's value. Homeowners in the Northeast encounter a bigger tax bill, but the total might represent a relative fraction of the value of their home. The median sales price for existing homes in the Northeast was $237,200 last year, compared to $143,700 in the Midwest, according to the National Association of Realtors.

The National Association of Home Builders basically divides the two -- a state's aggregate real estate taxes and its aggregate home values -- to create a "statewide effective real estate tax." They went on to rank the states in terms of their effective rate for property taxes. The national effective rate last year was 1.13 percent, according to the NAHB.

Here's a look at the 10 states with the highest effective real estate tax rates:



New Jersey homeowners still can't catch a break.

For good measure, here are the states with the lowest effective property tax rate, according to the National Association of Home Builders:



Erroneous Zestimates - Zillow’s wildy off online price estimates hamper sales

interesting article from New York Real Estate News from therealdeal.com

When “CBS This Morning” co-host Norah O’Donnell asked the CEO of Zillow recently about the accuracy of the website’s automated property value estimates, known as “Zestimates,” she touched on one of the most sensitive perception gaps in American real estate.

Zillow is the most popular online real estate information site, with 73 million unique visitors in December. Along with active listings of properties for sale, it also provides information on houses that are not on the market. You can enter the address or general location in a database of millions of homes and likely pull up key information — square footage, lot size, number of bedrooms and baths, photos, taxes — plus a Zestimate.

Shoppers, sellers and buyers routinely quote Zestimates to real estate agents — and to one another — as gauges of market value. If a house for sale has a Zestimate of $350,000, a buyer might challenge the seller’s list price of $425,000. Or a seller might demand to know from potential listing brokers why they say a property should sell for just $595,000, when Zillow has it at $685,000.

Disparities like these are daily occurrences and, in the words of one agent who posted on the industry blog ActiveRain, they are “the bane of my existence.” Consumers often take Zestimates “as gospel,” said Tim Freund, an agent with Dilbeck Real Estate in Westlake Village, California. If either the buyer or the seller won’t budge off Zillow’s estimated value, he told me in an interview, “that will kill a deal.”

Back to the question posed by O’Donnell: Are Zestimates accurate? And if they’re off the mark, how far off? Zillow CEO Spencer Rascoff answered that they’re “a good starting point,” but that nationwide Zestimates have a “median error rate” of about 8 percent.

Whoa. That sounds high. On a $500,000 house, that would be a $40,000 disparity — a lot of money on the table — and could create problems.

But here’s something Rascoff was not asked about: Localized median error rates on Zestimates sometimes far exceed the national median, which raises the odds that sellers and buyers will have conflicts over pricing. Though it’s not prominently featured on the website, at the bottom of Zillow’s home page in small type is the word “Zestimates.” This section provides helpful background information, along with valuation error rates by state and county — some of which are stunners.

For example, in Manhattan, the median valuation error rate is 11.1 percent — which could translate into a $109,000 disparity on an apartment selling for the median $980,000. In Brooklyn, the error rate is 10.4 percent. In some rural counties in California, error rates range as high as 32 percent. In San Francisco, it’s 11.2 percent. With a median home value of $1 million in San Francisco, according to Zillow estimates as of December, a median error rate at this level translates into a price disparity of $112,000.

Some real estate agents have done their own studies of accuracy levels of Zillow in their local markets. Last July, Robert Earl, an agent with Choice Homes Team in the Charlottesville, Virginia, area examined selling prices and Zestimates of all 21 homes sold that month in the nearby community of Lake Monticello. On 17 sales, Zillow overestimated values, including two houses that sold for 61 percent below the Zestimate.

In Carlsbad, California, Jeff Dowler, an agent with Solutions Real Estate, did a similar analysis on sales in two ZIP codes. He found that Zestimates came in below the selling price 70 percent of the time, with disparities ranging as high as $70,000. In 25 percent of the sales, Zestimates were higher than the contract price. In 95 percent of the cases, he said, “Zestimates were wrong. That does not inspire a lot of confidence, at least not for me.” In a second ZIP code, Dowler found that 100 percent of Zestimates were inaccurate, and that disparities were as large as $190,000.

So what do you do now that you’ve got the scoop on Zestimate accuracy? Most important, take Rascoff’’s advice: Look at them as no more than starting points in pricing discussions with the real authorities on local real estate values — experienced agents and appraisers. Zestimates are hardly gospel. Often, far from it.

Colorado leads the nation for home price gains; Denver's growth is even faster

interesting article from Denver Business Journal....

Colorado's home sales prices grew by 9.1 percent in January from a year earlier, the highest rate of appreciation of any state in the country, but metro Denver's growth rate was even higher, at 10 percent.

By comparison, the national average for home-price gains was 5.7 percent during the same one-year period, according to the latest Home Price Index from CoreLogic (NYSE: CLGX).

The rate increases include sales of foreclosed or real-estate owned (REO) homes collectively known as distressed properties.

Along with three other states, Colorado reached a new high in the Home Price Index since January 1976, when the index began.

"House-price appreciation has generally been stronger in the western half of the nation and the weakest in the mid-Atlantic and northeast states," said Frank Northcraft, chief economist at CoreLogic. "In part, these trends reflect the strength of regional economies. Colorado and Texas have had stronger job creation and have seen 8 to 9 percent price gains over the past 12 months in our combined indexes. In contrast, values were flat or down in Connecticut, Delaware and Maryland in our overall index, including distressed sales."

"A dearth in supply in many parts of the country is a big factor driving up prices," said Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic. "Many homeowners have taken advantage of low rates to refinance their homes, and until we see sustained increases in income levels and employment, they would be hunkered down so supplies may remain tights.

"Demand has picked up as low mortgage rates and the cut the Federal Housing Administration insurance premium reduce monthly payments for prospective homebuyers," Nallathambi said.

The CoreLogic report is one of several popular measures of home prices, using different methodologies, covering different housing types and geographical areas, and giving somewhat different results.

The most recent monthly S&P/Case-Shiller Home Prices Index report, issued Feb. 24 and covering December, showed metro-Denver home resale prices up 8.1 percent from a year earlier.

CoreLogic includes data on condominium sales in its reports; Case-Shiller does not.

DMAR Market Trends March 2015

Homebuyer Demand Remains Strong; Millennials Entering Market at Rapid Pace

Denver inventory remains low, which continues to drive up home prices. Year over year, home prices have increased 19 percent and 18 percent in the average and median sales price respectively. According to Anthony Rael, Chair of the DMAR Market Trends Committee:
"Scarcity of inventory and increasing home prices, coupled with the possibility mortgage interest rates will rise when the Federal Reserve meets in June, has millennials entering the real estate market at a rapid pace"

The number of active listings inched its way to an unprecedented low. However, February did usher in a healthy dose of new residential listings that represented a 13 percent increase from the month prior.

According to the report, the inventory of available homes (single family and condos) for sale was 4,079 at February month end. Notably, 4,240 homes came onto the market, 4,077 homes were placed under contract, and 2,667 homes closed at a median sold price of $295,000 and an average sold price of $348,127; resulting in a closed dollar volume of $928.45 million.

• Homes that went off the market for the holidays are back on, but are going under contract right away.
• Top three counties for SOLD properties in February: Denver (726), Arapahoe (554) & Jefferson (462)
• Top three counties for SOLD properties year-to-date: Denver (1331), Arapahoe (1165) & Jefferson (939)
• New home builders are releasing lots and building as fast as they can, but the availability of skilled craftsmen and materials is pushing "dirt-starts" 7-10 months out.